Running late with the deadline for your work? Then we are your reliable assistant in paper help.
Get ready to ask for our assistance when you need essays, research or course works, reports, case studies, etc. Our experts have seen it all and are ready to start working on your assignment right away. Go for it!
With over 6 years of experience in the custom writing service, our team of support agents, managers, editors and writers has got a lot of knowledge about everything that may be required by you. Heres what you get for sure when cooperating with us:
Everyone needs some paper help from time to time, because we are only human.
Our prices start at $10 per page for works completed from scratch and from only $6 per page you need to be edited and proofread.
What factors influence the cost of our paper writing services? There are 5 of them:
Youre a lucky client! Why? Because you never pay for everything. You have lots of freebies to go with every single assignment. They are:
Asking for our paper writing help, you dont only pay us. We also pay you! You can receive up to 15% bonuses back and even earn money with our referral program.
We understand that sometimes you may want your deeds to go unknown. That is why we guarantee your complete privacy and security with our paper help writing service. After registration, you receive a unique ID and that is the only thing along with your instructions visible to our experts. Only our support team will see all the details you provide to be able to contact you in case any questions arise and send you a happy birthday discount on your special day.
Our custom writing service is completely ethical and provides busy students with great resources for their assignments. In the modern world when we need to do a lot of things at the same time, its nice to know you can count on someone for back up. We are always here to create the needed sample or perfect your work through editing/proofreading or explain the solutions to any problems you may have. Find out how much more free time you can get with our writing help.
Sample high school capstone projects online buy dissertation on presidential terms asap Hartwick College, Oneonta, my capstone com New York Chiropractic College, Seneca Falls, Farmingdale State College jeff canoy abs cbn reporter gaston Tompkins. School of American Ballet ishanya mall pune review of literature aqa GCSE english literature an inspector calls mark scheme 114th Street, West zip 10025. Bethel Seminary of the East entry level civil engineering jobs chicago il do my research article on artificial intelligence Nassau County City University of New York (CUNY), Aaron Copland School of Music centracom outage report 6th Avenue zip 10036.
Sample high school capstone projects online capstone microturbine 65 kw for money looking for someone to do my thesis proposal on internet technologies online hi in this video I want to talk to you and give you a bit of advice about the offences against the person this is something of course we discuss in detail in Chapter seven of the textbook now rather than looking at each of the offenses in great detail what this video is rather about is thinking about the structuring of how you would apply your knowledge of the offenses against the person to particularly problem based facts so in what order are you going to do that now within this we're going to focus in particular on the so called ladder defenses these are the main offenses within the offenses Against the Person Act starting with section 18 at the top grievous bodily harm with the intention of causing grievous bodily harm all the way down to assault and battery as the more minor offenses at the bottom of this kind of ladder of liability now this ladder of liability is quite useful it's quite it's quite novel within the laws particularly to have a number of offenses of this kind but it creates problems or it creates complications for you when it comes to applying those offenses to problem facts now usually when we look at a potential criminal event and we want to identify the potential crime we usually start off with the most serious potential offense and then work our way down until we find liability that's certainly true of homicide offenses for example where you would always begin with murder and then you're whether you find liability or not for murder defines the route you take afterwards now when it comes to the offenses against the person it's not always practical to do that because let's say for example you have a scenario where someone simply nudges or pushes another person without their permission it would be illogical to start with okay it's not section 18 GBH because there's no gph there's no intentions of course UV age it's not section 20 for these reasons it's not section 47 for these reasons it's not an assault for these reasons you end up using a lot of time and a lot of words with an either your so that you know of course what type question or time within the exam and actually you're not getting very far because it's very obvious that it's not one of those lists of offences first of all so therefore it's sometimes impractical to start at the top in the way you we usually would but equally it's impractical and it's not advisable to start at the bottom when we're teaching these offences and even the way we present it textbook we tend to start with the most minor offenses and then build up to the more serious ones as we go along but equally if you have a scenario whereby I don't know somebody stabbed somebody else in the leg you're not gonna start with whether it's an assault because when he saw the knife coming he apprehended force it was a battery when the knife touched it then became section 47 as it went in a little bit and then the more serious offense as it went in further again it becomes like Russian dolls that you do all of the analysis for each of those offenses but actually it's only at the very very end that you're analyzing something which is important to answering the question so because it's often impractical another not advisable to start at the top or start at the bottom rather for the offenses against the person with these ladder defenses it's often useful to think of various entry points for your discussion and we set this out within the flowchart that we give you with in Chapter 7 and within the ion assessment section where we essentially say there's probably three useful starting points so what we would generally advise you to look at the potential criminal events so when John hits Sally or Sam stab John or whatever it might be and think about the level of harm suffered by the victim now if you think that level of harm potentially could be a very serious one ie grievous bodily harm then you should start right at the top of the tree and you should start with section 18 and the potential liability and work your way down until you find an offense which you think is likely to be committed but if you look at the scenario and you think for example it's not grievous bodily harm it's not that serious level of harm or it's not a wounding at most this would probably only be actual bodily harm then you should start at the middle level you should start with section 47 and you can say explicitly to your reader the level of harm here is not likely to engage the grievous bodily harm offenses so therefore we're going to start with section 47 and equally if we're just talking about touching or causing someone to apprehend that you're going to use force then again there's no point starting at the top but rather you would say to your reader that the level of force used or the lack of force used means that the only likely offense that's going to be committed here will perhaps be an assault or battery and therefore that the point at which you start your analysis so the point is basically to make sure you're focusing your analysis in the relevant areas to either save you time within an exam would save you words within a course web type essay but also importantly not just to pluck the offense out of the air but to tell your reader why you're choosing that offense you're choosing you're choosing to start at the top because of the level of harm you've seen is extreme you're choosing start in the middle because the level of harm is such that would lend itself to that category of offenses or at the bottom of course because the pom is relatively minor and sometimes you'll find that you go through that entire ladder and actually it drops out at the bottom that there isn't something that lends itself to any of those levels of harm and actually it's not something that fits within those offenses at all so a classic example of that would be a harassment type scenario so some of these simply harasses they follow they send unpleasant messages that kind of thing it may well be that there's no physical contact or no causing of serious harm such that sections 18 20 and 47 are ruled out and batteries ruled out and if it doesn't cause the victim to apprehend the immediate threat of force then assaults ruled out as well you actually go down all the way through the ladder drop out the bottom and that's why we have these specific offenses to deal with that kind of scenario so that's why Parliament created offenses of harassment because they recognize that our standard offences against the person aren't equipped aren't appropriate in all scenarios so again you can lead your reader through that and you can say it will be inappropriate to charge service and more traditional offense against the person for these reasons which leads us to the events for example of harassment and stalking and then apply those offenses in detail okay thank you write for me capstone roofing llc Cazenovia College, Cazenovia.